The insane 24-hour media cycle has unnecessarily burdened MPs and their staff. This time would be better spent developing good policy and investing their time with their party. This will make involvement more attractive and strengthen democracy.
It is discouraging to see policy created spontaneously as a result of a tight news cycle. At the very least, generic cialis discount a government’s cabinet should debate and decide policy over a period of at least one day, viagra usa preferably more. At best, a governing party’s membership should be informed of the need for a policy decision by way of discussion papers and allowed to take a vote or make submissions. This can be done easily with modern social media technology and will make membership more interesting. The public should be allowed to participate in this kind of policy debate, too.
It should be normal for politicians to be able to say to the press, “I will get back to you,” instead of making policy on-the-run. The media will object to our lengthening of the media cycle by claiming that by not instantly answering every single one of their questions they are being arrogant and undemocratically disrespectful of the voting public.
That will be when we should defend the lengthening of the political news cycle on the grounds that better policy outcomes for our country will arise from it.
To this end – genuine crises aside – a single day of the week should be selected for the release of new policy. Call it “Policy Tuesday”. The rest of the week can be spent debating, defending and refining it. There is enough news elsewhere to fill the bulletins – puppies, rape and killing.
There exists a fear that lengthening the political news cycle will provide the political opposition with an advantage if they do not play along with the spirit of the intent. They will be able to spend an extra six days making jabs at the possible upcoming policy from the governing party of the day. This has not yet been tested, though. All potentially good policy should be tested.